ATLAS: A flexible and extensible architecture for linguistic annotation

We describe a formal model for annotating linguistic artifacts, from which we derive an application programming interface (API) to a suite of tools for manipulating these annotations. The abstract logical model provides for a range of storage formats and promotes the reuse of tools that interact through this API. We focus first on ``Annotation Graphs,'' a graph model for annotations on linear signals (such as text and speech) indexed by intervals, for which efficient database storage and querying techniques are applicable. We note how a wide range of existing annotated corpora can be mapped to this annotation graph model. This model is then generalized to encompass a wider variety of linguistic ``signals,'' including both naturally occuring phenomena (as recorded in images, video, multi-modal interactions, etc.), as well as the derived resources that are increasingly important to the engineering of natural language processing systems (such as word lists, dictionaries, aligned bilingual corpora, etc.). We conclude with a review of the current efforts towards implementing key pieces of this architecture.Comment: 8 pages, 9 figure

Recent improvements to the ATLAS architecture

We examine the recent improvements that were made to the ATLAS (Architecture and Tools for Linguistic Analysis Systems) architecture. We first introduce the architecture and the historical context for this work. Next, we describe NIST’s initial implementation of the framework before analyzing it. We then focus on three important improvements (relating to multi-dimensional signals, hierarchical structures and validation) we have made to the architecture to make it more usable. We conclude by summarizing the major points covered and discuss plans for future work

The Rich Transcription 2005 Spring Meeting

This paper presents the design and results of the Rich Transcription Spring 2005 (RT-05S) Meeting Recognition Evaluation. This evaluation is the third in a series of community-wide evaluations of language technologies in the meeting domain. For 2005, four evaluation tasks were supported. These included a speech-to-text (STT) transcription task and three diarization tasks: "Who Spoke When", "Speech Activity Detection", and "Source Localization." The latter two were first-time experimental proof-of-concept tasks and were treated as "dry runs". For the STT task, the lowest word error rate for the multiple distant microphone condition was 30.0% which represented an impressive 33% relative reduction from the best result obtained in the last such evaluation - - the Rich Transcription Spring 2004 Meeting Recognition Evaluation. For the diarization "Who Spoke When" task, the lowest diarization error rate was 18.56% which represented a 19% relative reduction from that of RT-04S